Fall 2019, University of Vermont

Tuesdays and Thursdays 10:05am-11:20am in Dewey 314 and 11:40am-12:55pm in Lafayette L403

Office Hours: Tuesdays and Thursdays 4:05pm-5:00pm in Room 209, 70 S. Williams St., and by appointment

Note: This course contains a module on abortion. The course does not advocate any view on abortion, but instead focuses on identifying the logic of the arguments on both sides of the issue. If you are not comfortable with this, it will be easy for you to move to a different section of intro to philosophy that does not have such a module. Just let the instructor know right away after the first class meeting.

This course provides an introduction to ethics, and to philosophy more generally. It also includes modules on: the ethics of living an affluent life while letting others die who are in need, consequentialism, the nature of rights, consumer ethics, and environmental ethics and sustainability. This course will explore the different ethical issues that arise in the context of our choices both at the level of personal decision-making and as a society. We will address questions such as: what sorts of ethical obligations do we have to others? Do we have to make large sacrifices to help others in need? Is it always wrong to violate a person's right to life? Are the choices we make ethically constrained by our obligations to preserve the environment or animal wellbeing, or to preserve our own health and, if so, how are they constrained? Is it ethically permissible to eat meat? What are the correct fundamental principles of ethics, and what makes them correct?

This course has two related educational aims (goals, objectives). The first is to prepare you to begin developing and defending your own answers to these and other questions in ethics. The second is to equip you with a certain set of skills. Both in preparing for class, in your writing, and through class discussion and group work, you will develop your ability to (1) communicate clearly and concisely, (2) reconstruct arguments for a position or view from a piece of text, (3) critically evaluate arguments, (3) construct persuasive arguments of your own in defense of a position or view, and (4) anticipate and address potential objections to arguments that you find persuasive. Although deploying these skills will be crucial in your effort to advance your own thinking about the questions in ethics that we will discuss in this class, developing these skills has independent value as they can also be usefully applied in a variety of different domains outside of philosophy.

Evaluation: 40% Short quizzes (numerous) and writing assignments; 15% Midterm exam; 25% Final exam; 20% Final paper (~6-8 pages, can build on previous writing assignments).

All readings are freely available online via the links below. You should print them all out on paper and read them before class (old school).

Device ban: No use of phones or computers (or AppleWatches or…) without explicit permission. You should print all readings out on paper and read them before class.

August 27 and 29: Commonsense Principles, Radical Implications? Singer's Argument

September 10: Beneficence, Justice, Kantian Ethics

1. Onora O'Neill, "Rights, Obligations, and World Hunger"

Optional: Marcia Baron, "Kantian Ethics" (especially pp. 12-25, 59-60, 70-71)

September 12: Beneficence, Justice, Kantian Ethics

1. Anne Barnhill et al., pp. 36-50 "Global Hunger" (note: only pp. 36-50 are required)

Optional: Angus Deaton, "Response to Effective Altruism"

Optional: Bill Gates, "The Great Escape is an Excellent Book With One Big Flaw"

Optional: Kimiko de Freytas Tamura, "For Dignity and Development, East Africa Curbs Used Clothes Imports"

September 17 and 19: Utilitarianism and Consequentialism

1. Krister Bykvist, "What is utilitarianism?"

Optional: Doug Portmore, "Quiz on Hedonistic Act-Utilitarianism"

Optional: Doug Portmore, "Utilitarianism and Consequentialism: The Basics"

First short paper assignment

September 24 and 26: Objections to Consequentialism, the Trolley Problem

1. Judith Jarvis Thomson, "The Trolley Problem"

Optional: Krister Bykvist, "Is Utilitarianism too Demanding?", "Is Utilitarianism too Permissive?", and "The Way Outcomes are Brought About"

October 1: Ethical Limits to Markets?

1. Debra Satz, selections from Some Things Should Not Be For Sale

Optional: Hausman, McPherson, and Satz, selections on Summers memo in Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy

Optional: Helena de Bres, "Local Food: The Moral Case"

October 3: Case Study: Kidney Donation, Kidney Exchanges, Kidney Markets

1. Iris Marion Young, "Five Faces of Oppression"

Optional: Hallie Liberto, "Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause"

October 8 and 10: The Nature of Rights, What Follows From Having a Right, The Ethics of Ending Life

1. Judith Jarvis Thomson, "A Defense of Abortion"

October 15 and 17: Rights and the Ethics of Ending Life, Continued

1. Michael Tooley, "Thomson on Abortion"

2. Don Marquis, "An Argument that Abortion is Impermissible"

October 22 and 24: Wellbeing, Animal Ethics

1. Tristram McPherson, "How to Argue for (and against) Ethical Veganism" (note that this provides an excellent model for how to write your own philosophy papers in this course)

Midterm Exam Due